>You managed to respond, but didn't manage to actually say anything. If you want to argue the point, then make your argument. Claiming it is "nowhere near idiomatic" despite it being perfectly normal code and doing none of the things he claimed is not an argument.
Perfectly normal code that treats Java like C.
>Notice how I linked to the web benchmarks too?
This does not negate the fact that you also linked to these microbenchmarks, which was what I addressed.
Plus, the web benchmarks you linked to are also microbenchmarks. They are not measurements of a real life application -- it's mostly getting the framework to print "Hello World", or to do a few database calls, etc.
Again, put forth an argument. If all you can do is make unsubstantiated claims, then you might as well just keep them to yourself. You aren't furthering a discussion.
>This does not negate the fact that you also linked to these microbenchmarks
No, it negates your fallacious point. The claim that it only applies to microbenchmarks. The web benchmarks are not microbenchmarks, therefore it clearly does not only apply to microbenchmarks. Are you being deliberately dishonest?
>Plus, the web benchmarks you linked to are also microbenchmarks
If you consider an entire web server and framework to be a microbenchmark, then you are clearly being intellectually dishonest. This is not the forum for that kind of garbage, take it to reddit.
Perfectly normal code that treats Java like C.
>Notice how I linked to the web benchmarks too?
This does not negate the fact that you also linked to these microbenchmarks, which was what I addressed.
Plus, the web benchmarks you linked to are also microbenchmarks. They are not measurements of a real life application -- it's mostly getting the framework to print "Hello World", or to do a few database calls, etc.