Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A "no" is significantly better than a "contingent yes", because it lets you move in and focus your time and energy on getting a real yes.


But a "contingent yes" is a "yes". Totally disagree that a "no" is better.


It's often not, though. That's what this whole thread is about. Usually when investors waffle it's because they aren't going to commit anyway; they may think that they should and at one level want to, but their fear gets the best of them.


Maybe we're not talking about the same thing. A "contingent yes" is completely different from a "maybe". The rug guys were the "contingent yes", Google Ventures was the "maybe".

Suggesting "A "no" is significantly better than a "contingent yes"" is bizarre.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: