Sure, but they were on opposite sides for most of the time, and they inflicted horrendous casualties on each other (Germany suffered almost as many casualties in a single battle in the east as the entire war in the west, and Russia more so) and both committed horrible massacres on the civilian population of any neutral, conquered or enemy nation.

Given the numbers, saying Russia and Germany were on opposite sides in WW2 seems pretty accurate to me.

Why presume that the context of the game is the entire war? A lot of games and other media relating to the war focus on specific points in the war, and so your last statement doesn't necessarily apply to the game given the information conveyed in the article, specifically regarding the implication of historical inaccuracy.

Maybe there's a reason why it's not mentioned in Wikipedia? Like, eg. it's not founded on any reasonable sources?

Since you mention Wikipedia, are you suggesting all of the below are false as well?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_states

"...Tank Battle: East Front 1942..."

Mindless pedantry is one of the most irritating features of "hackers". Yes, we know you know a lot of stuff. Do you expect us to be impressed?

why? It's the game's name, and it says a lot. It looks like a tabletop wargame, and they are many times named like that.

I believe it's usually because they focus on a single battle, a specific zone and/or a specific time. That title helps the buyer quickly know what the game is about (Wargamers are, many times, history buffs)

[EDIT] I stand corrected. I sometime get lost in the tree-like way the replies are showed.

I should have been more clear. I was responding to "Not all of WW2 - they jointly invaded Poland", the reference to Katyn, and in fact the entire ensuing discussion which ignores the fact that the game is set in a period in which the two countries were at war, in favor of demonstrating who has command of the most precise irrelevancies.

Yes, all of WW2 they were opposing each other. Just because they split Poland doesn't mean they weren't enemies, it was nothing more than opportunism.

While Hitler was busy carving up Poland, he was planning the entire time for how to bring Russia to its knees. At no point did he plan for anything but eventual confrontation with Russia.

If I give you a ride home today, while plotting your demise for tomorrow, we're not pals.

That's hindsight. They were allies. They signed a pact, and they traded. True Hitler was plotting to invade Russia, but from the Russian perspective Germany was not the enemy.

I wonder how non-Stalin or non-Communist Russia would have done vs. the Germans. Purging military leadership wasn't helpful, but industrial production was.

Some of us would, perhaps. Not the British though (although you have to wonder about what would happen if Germany got the bomb first). America would definitely be speaking whatever the hell the wanted to.

Lucky that... Now only half of Europe was enslaved for generations :-(