"I don’t prefer to use Cucumber for any of my testing, but I do enjoy the Gherkin syntax. Not for testing, but for gathering feature requirements. It provides a very clear and concise way of explaining a feature, without confusion. But that is where the line is drawn."
That is also where I draw the line. The whole argument that other non-technical folks can read Gherkin may be true, but I can't imagine them enjoying it.
It's like reading computer-speak. Why can't features just be described in English...?
That is also where I draw the line. The whole argument that other non-technical folks can read Gherkin may be true, but I can't imagine them enjoying it.
It's like reading computer-speak. Why can't features just be described in English...?