Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your argument depends upon omniscience. It's not silly. It's absurd.


That's why the question is silly. The absurd answer illustrates a point. Fiction can illustrate a philosophy.


The question doesn't seem silly to me. I didn't see any obvious benefit.

It took a lot of work to find a possible candidate for an obvious benefit. Yet, given the recent utilitarian turn of your comments, I doubt that a Hobbesian analysis was the basis for the claim.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: