> But yes, it's an architecture question; my point being, most people pick many bulldozers while they need a 1 shovel.
Again, huh?
Client-server vs locally embedded does not map to "many bulldozers vs 1 shovel".
SQLite and Postgres aren't even really competitors. They serve extremely different use cases. I'm not aware that "most" people are picking Postgres when they "need" SQLite. What are you even basing this on? SQLite is already an extremely popular choice.
Again, huh?
Client-server vs locally embedded does not map to "many bulldozers vs 1 shovel".
SQLite and Postgres aren't even really competitors. They serve extremely different use cases. I'm not aware that "most" people are picking Postgres when they "need" SQLite. What are you even basing this on? SQLite is already an extremely popular choice.