Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Say we pay them 1 million dollars instead of (googled) 25 million dollars. If we increase the compensation by another 60 thousand dollars a year that gives us room for 400 additional mechanics.

The stock price of Ford might even go up if you could improve the repair situation.



He’s already only paid $1.6m in salary. Over $20m of his compensation is in stock. Someone else is paying him when they purchase his shares not Ford.


Who is “we?”

Who in this situation should decide to pay the CEO less? Is it regulators? The board? Shareholders?

I’m trying to understand your model for how executive compensation should be set.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: