Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coaliti... Supreme Court wrote:

The Child Pornography Prevention Act also prohibits speech having serious redeeming value, proscribing the visual depiction of an idea -- that of teenagers engaging in sexual activity -- that is a fact of modern society and has been a theme in art and literature for centuries.



He seems to be writing primarily about Sweden.


I think the argument stands. I think even in Sweden, teenagers engaging in sexual activity is a fact of modern society and has been a theme in art and literature for centuries.


I guess I misinterpreted you- I thought you were saying the free-speech-favorable outcome of the case meant his concerns were moot.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: