>Right now it seems like the appeals process is going to be like shooting fish in a barrel for Samsung, thanks in part to Hogan and his traveling Dunning-Kruger show.
This is something I've been wondering about. Is any of this going to be admissible in the appeal?
A judge will only overrule a jury verdict for proven gross misconduct (mere incompetence or confusion is not enough) or because they judge that no reasonable jury could have decided as the jury did, given the evidence put forward. It does not matter if the jury came to the decision in a way that may not be reasonable, if a reasonable jury could have reached the same verdict.
This is something I've been wondering about. Is any of this going to be admissible in the appeal?