What I don't understand is the Judge/Lawyers must know that the Jury aren't experts in technology or the law. Why do they not spend a substantial amount of time explaining prior art, the laws pertaining to prior art, and the Jury's options with regards to prior art?
For example, after the two sides have presented their case, why not spend a day or two just explaining the basics of the laws in play to the Jury before they start deliberations?
Easy, Judge Koh set forth an extremely limited pool of time each party was allowed in front of jurors. And what about putting it in the brief / instructions the jurors are intended to read? Easy, the jurors didn't read it; they were nearly prepared to execute maximum damages against Samsung before entering deliberation.
For example, after the two sides have presented their case, why not spend a day or two just explaining the basics of the laws in play to the Jury before they start deliberations?