Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Designing a life support system that is stable and self-correcting and isn't in danger of running out of some essential raw material or element isn't just an unsolved problem, it's a barely considered problem.

Earth science closed loop ecologists since the 60s would like a word with you...



And how many closed loop ecologies functioned for any significant length of time without constant resouces and parts from outside being put in? Not to mention without lead times of 9+ months on those supplies, and not having to worry about large pressure differences and leaks, radiation, or extremely abrasive enviroments?


The fact that a perfect solution hasn't been found doesn't mean that nothing has been (or is being) studied.

The entire point of Biosphere 2 was to run a closed system for long enough to discover unexpected causes of failure.

Aka science.


Of course the science has to be done and is useful, but there is still a huge leap between doing it on earth and doing it in an entirely different body and harsher enviroment, and we haven't done it on earth despite many attempts.

Its not like its just some small details that need some fine tuning or funding to achieve and just around the corner. The scale of building just an empty multi-acre structure off earth to start would by itself dwarf all our previous space projects combined.


Yes and no. Part of the benefit of closed ecologies is that they're... closed.

So unravel the major dynamics on Earth, and as on another body with gravity and sunlight (to a first approximation).


Biosphere and Biosphere 2 have entered the chat.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: