> Databases with journal_mode=wal cannot be modified via LiteVFS (but can be read)
Without modifying SQLite (what the Turso guys did), the WAL index is hard (but not impossible) to share across a network boundary. I'm guessing that's the why here. There's a hack that I'm pretty confident works, but I'm not sure how it behaves under latency (sure enough that I use it for Windows, and it hasn't caused issues running mptest thousands of times in CI over months).
Does this mean your SQLite database size is no longer restricted by your local disk capacity?