Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is sort of ballsy, because they're going to have this throw in their face next time they have an outage.


Hopefully next time we have to apologize for something going wrong we'll be able to do a better job than the standard "We apologize for the inconvenience" reply.


here's how a company such as yours can do better (i'm addressing a web app company in general, not 37s in particular):

* reassure users that the service was "merely" unavailable and no data was lost (i think you already do this)

* explain specifically what happened and why to the best of your knowledge (i think you already do this)

* explain specifically what you're going to do to ensure it doesn't happen again, within reason

* if the downtime is extensive, give paying users a free month or whatever of service (i think you would already do this), within reason


I agree that explaining the reasons/remediation is a good idea.

If you pay X for a service, generally you'll have an idea of the service level and value you expect. I think most people are reasonable about this.

Customers that go off the rails (no pun intended) because of an outage in a free/inexpensive service are probably customers you don't want to have.


You met your standard last time:

http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/800-what-happened-this-mo...

(Although the Rackspace comment might have been a tactical error).

I was impressed with the post today, is why I commented.


I'd suggest thirty-foot high letters of fire

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Places_in_The_Hitchhiker's_Guid...


They already have.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: