No, I just get upset when women are reduced to sex objects, particularly in a context where people are forced to endure it because they have to work for a living.
I suppose you would also support putting up racial epithets in a corporate lobby and calling it "art"?
I feel like some kind of infernal being talking to me right now.
How do big boobs reduce women (which women? how many of them? what's their names?) to sex objects? What's a sex object anyway? Are you supposed to deny the existence of big boobs to prevent it? What happens if truth leaks?
This is exactly a set of questions that DOES NOT cross the mind of people who drop "women are reduced to sex objects" in the conversations. You are afraid to think. You want to club people with blocks over their heads.
That's why art is a good thing. Is reflects the damage back to you. You desperately need to make peace with your sexuality; and once you do, the shadows will disappear and big boobs will be just big boobs and nothing more.
I hope that viewing those pieces I've linked will make you a happier and calmer person. Cheers and good night.
It is not far fetched given that "big boobs" is interpreted in a societal context which is dominated by male gaze. That is, big boobs is "artsy" and "funny" for a man, since he is the target audience of the joke. Someone at the other end of the joke might take offense. Especially if you experience similar events on a daily basis within your professional environment. Just because something could qualify as art, doesn't mean that you are not allowed to scrutinize it.
I suggest that you employ a bit of empathy instead of drawing assumptions about the persona of the other party.
Putting up twenty links to Wulff & Morgenthaler (epic comics) and using it as an educational/critical source without context only dilutes what you are trying to say, i.e. people should more relaxed.
That being said, being able to figure out how to spell anything sensible using 8 sixteen-digit letters is an accomplishment.
I fail to understand the step where the other end takes offense. It's almost like underpant gnomes:
1. Big boobs in code.
2. ?????
3. Offended people.
What's that stage?
Big boobs are a fact of everyday life. If for some reason their mention casts such strong emotions, perhaps there are deep problems in the workplace culture. Art lets you expose that. But art is not a source of those hypothetical problems, rather than reactions to it are merely indicators.
I don't say people should be more relaxed. People should get better; It usually involves them getting a little worse first. Force them to reflect. Force them to negotiate peace with their sexuality and their environment.
There are people who were sexually injured - but then again, people die of hunger. Should we not eat or talk about food since it would offend famine victims?
I suppose you would also support putting up racial epithets in a corporate lobby and calling it "art"?