> Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that.
It depends what you are trying to sensor. Saying something like "The Rothschild family control everything and are lizard people" can be laughed off, but something closer to reality could be very sensitive.
It doesn't need to be a massive conspiracy theory either, it could just be something like a medical condition leaked online.
If you think this kind of stuff doesn't happen, the Royal Family of the UK are quite open about it [0]. The law literally does not apply to them [1]. They go to a lot of effort to hide their wealth and financial matters [2].
It depends what you are trying to sensor. Saying something like "The Rothschild family control everything and are lizard people" can be laughed off, but something closer to reality could be very sensitive.
It doesn't need to be a massive conspiracy theory either, it could just be something like a medical condition leaked online.
If you think this kind of stuff doesn't happen, the Royal Family of the UK are quite open about it [0]. The law literally does not apply to them [1]. They go to a lot of effort to hide their wealth and financial matters [2].
[0] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked...
[1] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-brit...