Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Google Cloud Storage is good enough to implement locks all by itself: https://reddit.com/r/golang/comments/t52d4f/gmutex_a_global_...

Doesn't S3 provide primitives to do the same? At least since moving to strong read-after-write consistency?

PS: I wrote the above package. Happy to answer questions about it.



Conditional write is just added to S3 2 month ago: https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2024/08/amazon-s3...


Unfortunately this functionality is much more limited in S3 as you can only use `If-None-Match: *` to prevent overwrites. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/condit...

GCS also allows for conditional overwrites using `If-Match: <etag>` which means you can do optimistic concurrency control. https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/request-preconditions


Yeah, it might still be possible to implement a mutex based on just the existence of an object, but it'll be harder to add expiration/liveness which I find essential.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: