> IMHO the article is about "data" as in "personal information", but let's indulge in your generalization.
That is weird on its own, because I don't see how Kay's quote could be in any way about it. I appreciate the article on its own, but in context of the quote and discussion it's taken from, it feels like it's only related because it uses the word "data".
That is weird on its own, because I don't see how Kay's quote could be in any way about it. I appreciate the article on its own, but in context of the quote and discussion it's taken from, it feels like it's only related because it uses the word "data".