Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For all intents and purposes, booby traps are illegal 100% of the time regardless of the reason for their construction or the damage they cause. A booby trap that squirts water is as illegal as one that fires bullets, and one that misses someone is as illegal as one that hits someone (although hitting someone opens you up to other charges but unrelated to the booby trap).

This is a pretty good example of arguing from the way you feel like the law should be written rather than how it's actually written.

Just to be clear - this is not really up to judgment or interpretation, you are just completely wrong. So I wouldn't do anything based on this (very incorrect) reading of law.



So Mark Rober is just getting away with breaking the law and publicly posting his lawbreaking exploits on YouTube? https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgeXOVaJo_gnexNopBzUK...

To be clear: that could be what's going on here. But I suspect the law on this topic is a bit more subtle than this comment suggests.


He has admitted those videos are 100% staged with hired actors.

https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/a8848z/mark_robers...


I believe your summary of that Reddit comment is overly-broad: he admitted two of the videos involved a friend-of-a-friend volunteer that he was "unaware" had staged the theft. The thread then goes on to do some heavy extrapolating based on that thin evidence.


Yes. He's just doing it in such a way that the legal system feels little to no impetus to intervene.

In practical terms, the legal hazard to such a trap is the possibility that one of two things happens:

1. You injure the target in a way you didn't intend, such as causing an eye injury with a glitter bomb, which gets the attention of authorities.

2. Someone who isn't the target inadvertently sets it off and is sufficiently pissed off to seek legal redress.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: