Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My example was to show the lack of ability to think critically or consider evidence in most of the voting population.

Not wanting to get the vaccine is not the disqualifier, but the reasons justifying that decision could be.



But who is qualified to be the arbiter of Truth when it comes to the reasoning?

Truth and agreement at the abstract level where we're working right now is easy, but the move to the object level is anything but (even though it seems easy).


This really isn't the hard problem.

People of good repute with the necessary qualifications to understand scientific findings.

Really, that's it. We're mostly just trying to stop the cuckoo fox news/alex jones crowd from voting and for good reason.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: