Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is not a very compelling argument.


Can you be more specific? Just saying it's not compelling doesn't add anything to the conversation


AI as a mechanism for allowing Google (or whoever) to deliver the same information we already have through an inevitable additional opaque layer of bias and advertising would be seen as a horror if so many people weren't impressed by the gee whiz factor of it.


Why? They tune their algos/metrics to specific metrics.

Main metrics for their business is engagements(how many queries you do on google.com) and Ads clicks, and not how precise answer you got.


And yet I find it vastly more compelling than your addition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: