Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Unfortunately you can't do the reverse, pin to p core


You can in a way, if you tie up the E cores by pinning work to them exclusively, the scheduler will send other stuff to the P cores due to resource constraint avoidance attempts. It's not power efficient to sit and wait for an efficient core when you can buzz it through a P core super quick and get back to idle, I would imagine haha




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: