>This not only avoids the burden of dealing with negative numbers (such as the myriad of language-specific wraparound consequences of overflow… or underflow),
Is this supposed to be some kind of joke?
Unsigned underflow wraps around to the highest number. Meanwhile signed gives you a negative number, which tends to be properly handled by code that assumes positive numbers.
Is this supposed to be some kind of joke?
Unsigned underflow wraps around to the highest number. Meanwhile signed gives you a negative number, which tends to be properly handled by code that assumes positive numbers.