Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For this to be similar, you'd have to make a distinction between someone copying music bit by bit and distributing the original file, vs someone making a COVER recording of a famous song (no matter how accurate), and distributing that for free.

No matter how much RIAA and MPAA would like to change it, recording covers for existing music, I believe, is fully supported culturally and legally.



> recording covers for existing music, I believe, is fully supported culturally and legally.

Yes, so long as the correct licences are paid. If it's a live cover the venue will be paying licence fees and if it's a recorded cover the band will need licence as soon as they start distributing it.


So if anything, downloading music and films is worse than what they did to Curtis?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: