Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s not just actresses. A friend of mine worked for entertainment news and was “propositioned” by Harvey Weinstein. As far as I know it was an open secret in the business.

A union can’t just take action by outing the women who could have complained. And largely the affected women decided that they would rather make money than be disbelieved by media and courts on a rape allegation. Let’s say the union has your back: then what? SAG can’t guarantee you won’t be silently blacklisted as a troublemaker by individual directors making hiring decisions. They can’t guarantee you’ll be taken seriously by the police and courts. #MeToo was a watershed moment, and it’s hard to see how a union could have made the social structural stars align in our entire culture any earlier than it actually happened.



The union literally exists to protect actors and actresses from the very thing they failed to protect against.

What does the SAG even do? They don't seem to be protecting or advocating for anyone.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: