And they're still complaining about the handful of cases that were missed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29022906
----
Another mistake IMHO was that they accepted too many "dictionary characters", i.e. the ones only seen once or twice in some obscure dictionary -- they often had explanations like "an obscure form of [common character]".
And they're still complaining about the handful of cases that were missed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29022906
----
Another mistake IMHO was that they accepted too many "dictionary characters", i.e. the ones only seen once or twice in some obscure dictionary -- they often had explanations like "an obscure form of [common character]".