Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Controlled burns cost money, no doubt. But just an example, California's fire suppression complex is very well funded. California has a fleet of 747s and other huge aircraft, just for example.

My guess is there's no funding where there's no people and where there are people, there's funding but the people's arrangement prevents controlled burns.



> California's fire suppression complex is very well funded

Perhaps very well funded for putting out an existing fire at a specific spot.

Controlled burns for prevention need to occur over VAST areas--it's an O(1) vs O(n^2) scaling problem.


I thought CA contracted out most of the aviation and one of the big companies sold their fire fighting 747 and it was converted to a cargo plane.

Cal fire operates some small craft I think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: