Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am a lawyer, and as flimsy and wishy-washy as the term "open-source" already is, I can't even fathom what is meant by "open source" here?

Are people suggesting that "look at the code but don't touch" actually fits what some people think of as open source?



NOT a lawyer here, basially they meant, here the thing, please don't sue me if you messed up.


That's weird, because we do have extremely standard language to take care of that. That's just "warranty disclaimers"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: