Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

500 Wh/kg means Sulphur cathode, which also explains the solid electrolyte. Roughly speaking, it'll be 3x as energy dense but only a 1/2 as volumetrically efficient (so, a given capacity battery will weigh 1/3 less but take up twice as much space).

There are other approaches to Li-S (and Al-S and Mn-S) which will be less expensive. Grats to CATL for bringing this to market, but the race for sure isn't over yet.



Maybe volumetric inefficiency is where "condensed" part of the announcement comes in? Just spitballing here, would love to know more details.


Honestly it doesn't seem like that big a drawback. EVs for instance have reclaimed lots of space from under the hood, the gas tank, the exhaust system and more.


A lot of other comments are saying 2x as dense (that current norms are around 250Wh/kg for mass produced and widely available product)… can you square that with your 3x claim? Am I missing something?


> 3x as energy dense but only a 1/2 as volumetrically efficient (so, a given capacity battery will weigh 1/3 less

It would weigh 1/3, not 1/3 less.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: