Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When you open your mouth and speak about someone, there is intent.

Whether you believe the words you speak or not is irrelevant. If you don't want to be accused of defamation, don't open your mouth and speak publicly about other people if you don't have confirmation of the truth of your words.



Is that how it works? So it's not safe to repeat anything you heard on the news? Or read online? Basically can't repeat anything that you didn't personally witness? So "the statement must have been made with knowledge that it was untrue or with reckless disregard for the truth" is not right? (or you have no idea of what you're talking about?)


> repeat anything

Isn't it obvious? Which of the following statements do you think John Doe might take action against you for:

  "John Doe is a great guy". 
  "John Doe isn't a great guy". 
  "John Doe defrauded the bank and stole money from business partners".
If the last one is false but you keep repeating it on your blog out of ignorance, have a guess what will happen?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: