> but isn't server-side wasm basically solving the need for source translation? ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		imwithstoopid on March 24, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The tug-of-war over server-side WebAssembly > but isn't server-side wasm basically solving the need for source translation? hypothetically...but it would also move part of your integration testing into the realm of wasm I can't think of why this is better than just translating functionality into the language you are using

camgunz on March 25, 2023 [–]

> I can't think of why this is better than just translating functionality into the language you are using

Because this can be a huge amount of effort.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact