I understand that (label second '(...)) makes second evaluate to that in the future, statefully, but, the lambda symbol doesn't even appear to have a definition; furthermore, if you try to use it in a way that would work with a real lambda, it doesn't work.
It's triggered when the `fn` is not callable, i.e. when we pass in lambda:
[:lambda, [:x], [:car, [:cdr, :x]]]
The code ignores the `:lambda` symbol (that would be `@env[fn][0]`).
It evals the third element of the list (the lambda body) in a new context that combines `@env` and the binding of lambda's args to the symbols in the lambda's definition -- that's what the `Hash` mumbo jumbo creates.