I feel this is suffering from the typical US problem that public infrastructure does either not get built at all or in a super expensive way. There must be ways to build these crossings way cheaper than 90 million and place them in more locations. They only have to hold animals that at best weight a few hundred pounds.
> They only have to hold animals that at best weight a few hundred pounds.
Uhm. I think there is some misunderstanding here. These wildlife crossings are more than just a plank going over the road. They are basically a bridge with a small patch of forest on them (or whatever vegetation matches the surrounding area).
> To encourage use by wildlife, the bridge will have lush but drought-tolerant vegetation with matte materials to deflect bright headlights and insulation to quiet the roar of cars. Fencing at each end will help funnel them onto the crossing.
I don’t know what is the fair price of a 165-foot-wide (50 m) and 200-foot-long (61 m) overpass holding up a small forest, but I know that the additional weight of the animals crossing is not a significant factor in it at all.
Now obviously if we could convince wildlife to use something much narrower and simpler built like a pedestrian bridge maybe we could drive down the costs, i’m not sure if that has been tested or not.
