Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you can run 1 server instead of 3 though... that means no ansible, no kubernetes, no wild deployment strategies, 1/3 the likelihood of hardware failure, etc


This isn't true, at all. We are not "high availability" by any means but running on one server has significant risks, _especially_ if you don't use some form of automated provisioning. A destructive app logic bug is far more likely than a hardware failure, and in both cases the impact on your service is significant if you have one instance, but likely manageable if you have more than one.


Why wouldn't you use ansible to manage one server?

It's a great tool with a low learning curve that just requires SSH.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: