Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah yes ye olde 4 hours of storage quotes from the Li(a)zard People. Hope you don't run into one of those 3 week wind lulls or anything.

Lazard uses the worst possible nuclear builds and ignores the good ones. They ignore China, Korea, Japanese, and Russian builds. In 2006 Japan was churning out ultra-modern ABWR reactors in 36 months (not the old Fukushima kind). Unbelievably cheap and effective. Today, China's Hualong One builds are fully serialized. Yet Lazard keeps on looking at the worst 2 nuclear builds in history and ignoring e.g. the necessary cost of new transmission and overbuilding in order to actually decarbonize at scale with wind solar and gigatonnes of batteries.

Lazard numbers are a farce. Please ignore.



> Ah yes ye olde 4 hours of storage quotes from the Li(a)zard People. Hope you don't run into one of those 3 week wind lulls or anything.

This is why you have a blend of solar, wind and HVEC transmission lines across windzones!

Rolling blackouts (which is the kind of thing that batteries prevent) average less than 2 hours across the US and Europe, so 4 hours is great.

Did you know that the measured availability rates for non-renewable technologies is as follows:

> Historical estimates of 1−EFORd for competing technologies are 89.7%, 92.0%, and 97.3% for natural gas, coal, and nuclear plants, respectively.[1]

[1] https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(19)30300-9#se...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: