I don't know how much nuclear reactors have advanced. But I can understand the fear in the someone's back of their mind: What if something goes wrong?
I see this risk = Fallout x Probability. Even though the proponents argue that the tech is much more safer, the fallout is so huge and generational that its it neutralises the low probability of any accidents.
But wouldn't even another Chernobyl-scale disaster be a drop in the bucket compared to what the climate doomsday cult says will happen if we don't stop burning coal and gas?
I see this risk = Fallout x Probability. Even though the proponents argue that the tech is much more safer, the fallout is so huge and generational that its it neutralises the low probability of any accidents.
PS: I am neither for or against the nuclear tech.