Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It was a failed o-ring from launching in too cold of temperatures that caused the Challenger disaster though, not a failure of the rocket fuel. The engineers that understood the danger to the o-rings objected to the launch and would not sign off on it, but they were overruled by NASA's broken management culture at the time and the rest is history. There was a thorough investigation and it placed the blame squarely on NASA management for the root cause of launching under conditions that were dangerous to the shuttle design.


This was the investigation largely carried out by Richard Feynman, who ignored much of the other investigators to actually get to the root of the issue.


The real question is why they had o-rings. Because it was built in parts.

Why was it built in parts? Because it was built in Utah.


And because the Shuttle had two launch sites, one on either coast. And because the different segments had different propellant profiles for different stages of flight. And because inspection and manufacturing in segments is a lot easier.


This is a reference to it requiring shipment to the launch site right? That shipment was more practical under bite sized chunks no?


Yep, shipped by rail, so that jobs were more evenly distributed, and thus cost twice as much, worked half as well, and killed way more people


This sounds like a good time to insert the very old joke about how the size of a horse's ass determined the size of the booster rockets.

https://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/256024.aspx


Built in as many congressional districts as possible for "job creation"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: