> It is not other people's responsibility to stay up to date on what may or may not be triggering you on any particular day.
The internet moves fast now, if there's a growing trend of a slang-word to get around hate speech laws without actually breaking any, and everyone reacting to it understands it... then it's hate-speech right?
"groomer" is only used in the context of hatred towards a particular group without technically violating any hate-laws. It's quickly becoming a way to say "fagg*t" without saying it...
We wouldn't have any words left to use if it was up to you I guess.
And what "hate-laws" are you referring to, in regards to speech, that people are "getting around"? You do know Twitter TOS is not the actual law right?
> We wouldn't have any words left to use if it was up to you I guess.
Good point, that's a bit of an extreme though and context/intent does matter.
> And what "hate-laws" are you referring to, in regards to speech, that people are "getting around"? You do know Twitter TOS is not the actual law right?
True, I meant the Twitter TOS I guess. But Musk wants to model the TOS as anything within the confines of the law right?
The internet moves fast now, if there's a growing trend of a slang-word to get around hate speech laws without actually breaking any, and everyone reacting to it understands it... then it's hate-speech right?
"groomer" is only used in the context of hatred towards a particular group without technically violating any hate-laws. It's quickly becoming a way to say "fagg*t" without saying it...