> Making bad things illegal seems like a decent idea until they make something you like doing illegal

Therefore just have no laws, I guess?

Sometimes an imperfect, abusable system is better than no system. In fact, I'd wager that's usually the case.

Just don't venture to places where that is not the case and we can agree. We have different requirements for interesting platforms and should keep it separated for the most part.

No. But have a system where some single powerful person can't just make up laws on a whim.

You could make this sort of argument for executive orders, though.