I think the lock-in effect is driven by a desire to retain (and easily access) memory of prior experiences (emails sent, bugs fixed, etc.) and not based on 'investment made'
The sunk-cost fallacy doesn't really apply here because the time spent using emacs in the future would be spent on any tool that was chosen instead.
The sunk-cost fallacy doesn't really apply here because the time spent using emacs in the future would be spent on any tool that was chosen instead.