Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> There is a group of people for whom "work friends" are really important.

These people are generally very disruptive and a huge burden on people not looking to mix their social and professional lives. The reason they’ve been encouraged to build personal relationships at work despite the disruptions is that their goals aligned with those of sociopathic middle and upper management that puts their personal desire to see their “resources” churning away IRL ahead of actual productivity. The move to WFH is going to expose the whole “office culture” mindset for what it is.

> And so for those people who really value the "work friendship", that is essentially part of their compensation.

Will those of us who are forced to play the role of emotional caretaker of our co-workers also be compensated for our labor? For having to navigate office romances and nepotism? Time asked to drink after work?

I actually think the Gervais Principle is a great way to look at this:

https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-...

In short, the sociopaths have the clueless building their entire lives out of the office. The losers until now have just had to suffer, but WFH is the first chance in a long time for them to score a win.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: