> Management should only care about the results and money. How we organize to get any particular thing done, should be no one else's concern.
This is pretty much what scrum is kinda supposed to be when implemented properly. (No True Scrumsman Fallacy =P )
"Management" has a prioritised backlog of items, the team commits to executing one of the top items in an allotted timeframe. During the timeframe "Management" is not allowed to influence the work in any way or change the specifications midway.
If they do, everything done so far is supposed to be scrapped and the timeframe starts from scratch - this clause is there to give an actual measurable cost to messing with the team during a sprint.
This is pretty much what scrum is kinda supposed to be when implemented properly. (No True Scrumsman Fallacy =P )
"Management" has a prioritised backlog of items, the team commits to executing one of the top items in an allotted timeframe. During the timeframe "Management" is not allowed to influence the work in any way or change the specifications midway.
If they do, everything done so far is supposed to be scrapped and the timeframe starts from scratch - this clause is there to give an actual measurable cost to messing with the team during a sprint.