Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They would just stop making the phone.


Or they'll loudly whine and then follow their orders like Microsoft did back in the day.


Getting short-term compliance is the easy part. But the hard part is calculating how this changes the business incentives of a company and how they adapt to this compliance over time.

What orders did Microsoft follow in specific, what are you referring about? Let's see how this has actually impacted their business today.


> They would just stop making the phone.

Stop making their high margin hardware that integrates into paid Apple services? The same phone that works with other massively popular Apple hardware, such as Air Pods? Extremely doubtful.

Apple will not cut off their nose to spite their face.

Maybe you have less faith in Apple than I do. I believe they can succeed enormously without their monopoly. They make great products. Microsoft managed just fine (look at their market cap!)

edit: I'm confused. Are the downvotes from Apple fans that think the hardware sucks without the monopoly? And that Apple can't survive without it?


HN is just a massive downvote crew nowadays without any arguments. Since the karma system does not penalize this behavior it is widespread.


I think if Tim Cook announced he was stopping iPhone production, he would find himself unemployed by the end of the day.


Apple will stop making the iPhone?

That's crazy talk. It's literally their most successful product line ever.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: