> No. The reason people are using Twitter is because most other people are using Twitter. The network effect is very real and very strong on social media.
Trump has millions of followers on his email lists. He could send out an email or SMS tomorrow inviting his followers to begin posting on a new Donald Trump Gab or Mastodon server. Edit: heck, he could even post it on his twitter!
He chooses to post on twitter instead. He doesn’t even try to use an alternative website.
This is not about restricting his free speech, this is about him trying to drum up controversy.
I already said this goes beyond Trump. Others have been censored before, and they won't be the last. Trump is the only person in a position to actually do something about it.
Trump could set up an alternative to twitter tomorrow using his billion dollar fortune as seed capital. The technology is already out there - GNUSocial, Gab, and Mastodon.
Look at theDonald.win as an example. Reddit banned their forum, so they created a new website where they can post.
Trump has the audience of millions to create a right-wing only website where his followers can chat together if they wish, or he could encourage his followers to join Gab.
Obviously you can't see beyond Trump. I'm trying to make a point about freedom of speech on the Internet, and you can't see beyond "orange man has money". There are broader issues at stake here than partisan politics. The next decade could shape the rest of the century. I certainly don't want that century to be dictated to by private companies whose only guiding principle is profit.
Trump has millions of followers on his email lists. He could send out an email or SMS tomorrow inviting his followers to begin posting on a new Donald Trump Gab or Mastodon server. Edit: heck, he could even post it on his twitter!
He chooses to post on twitter instead. He doesn’t even try to use an alternative website.
This is not about restricting his free speech, this is about him trying to drum up controversy.