Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I think publishing a book requires a team.

No, you just need better tools to do so. Of course, having humans reviewing your book can help increase the quality, but that has nothing to do with having a publisher.

> I have found kindle books that come from a reputable publisher are MUCH higher quality

You are also biased because there are a LOT of really bad books published by traditional publishers anyway.



I understand what you're saying, but I disagree.

Tools won't find plot holes, they won't find one-dimensional characters, they won't find pacing problems.

Having a publisher means someone cares about their reputation, that there are risks, that resources are devoted to quality.

To be clear, I'm not saying that self-publishing means you will get a terrible book.

It's just that self-publishing is inclusive, published books are exclusive, and that changes the statistics. It's hard to locate a good book in a sea of self-published books where there are no quality bars.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: