When was action going to be taken? Under DACA participants can renew every two years with no limit on how many renewals they can do. That's amnesty.
Regardless, there is nothing in the constitution that says an executive order cannot be reversed by a later president. The courts acted as if there is and ordered the continued implementation of DACA.
You don't have to set a date for action to be taken... that still isn't amnesty.
Just because a president can reverse a decision doesn't mean they always can.
The case that kept DACA going was on behalf of those participating right? So it would seem something related to that was the reason for continuing the program.
> You don't have to set a date for action to be taken... that still isn't amnesty.
I clearly stated "effective amnesty" in my original post. If the day of action can be indefinitely put off, then it's effective amnesty.
>Just because a president can reverse a decision doesn't mean they always can.
What is the constitutional basis for a prior president's executive orders being irreversible by a later president?
>The case that kept DACA going was on behalf of those participating right? So it would seem something related to that was the reason for continuing the program.
What's the constitutional, or statutory, basis for non-citizens who have no lawful status in the country, to have a right to remain in the country?
I feel like you could answer most of your questions by simply reading the decision(s) related to the DACA case.
You're understanding or at least shifting statements that revolve around this being purely a case where a president has the right to change course is simply not the only factor at play.
You seem more concerned about the question of immigration rather than the actual law / decisions in play.
When was action going to be taken? Under DACA participants can renew every two years with no limit on how many renewals they can do. That's amnesty.
Regardless, there is nothing in the constitution that says an executive order cannot be reversed by a later president. The courts acted as if there is and ordered the continued implementation of DACA.