If the going price for a used Nintendo Switch is $100 then that is your net worth, not your “theoretical“ net worth. You don’t get to redefine common phrases with specific definitions.
The difference is that you have to find a buyer for your switch if you want to eat, while the supermarket is required to take your cash.
This becomes even more difficult for owner large amounts of shares in the same company since you selling could have a negative effect on the shares. The reason they have the value could be that the market thinks you are in it for a long time and will provide additional value, once you start selling it could trigger a larger sell-off.
Or there could be a financial crash and the value could be cut in half.
So cash and cash-equivalent assets are special and worth more if you need to eat right now.
There are laws in place in most countries meaning yes.
Even ignoring legal issues, for practical purposes society has accepted cash as the way to do trade. Everybody has cash (credit cards and checks are a proxy for cash) Thus a supermarket that doesn't accept cash is going to have problems selling anything because most people won't really know.
I'd like to know too! The only ones I could find in a quick search are France and (maybe?) China. Knowing about the others might be useful when travelling.
My point is that all net worth is theoretical as measured in currency D except the extreme edge case where your only asset is cash or cash equivalent in currency D.
I am not redefining net worth so much as I am pointing out its theoretical (read: unrealized) nature.
