> Where you fall on the line, from "no abortions, ever" to "abortion up to a week after birth, no questions asked"
This is the false dichotomy so often pushed by right-wing ideologues. Literally nobody on any side of the abortion debate advocates for "abortions up to a week after birth" or anywhere close to that. This sort of boolean thinking is the root of our (especially current) toxic political climate.
It seems like that might be difficult for you to believe, considering the bias inherent in your own statement, but I've never seen anyone on the "right" side of this debate not at least make exception for "health of the mother" or rape. So, to my eyes, both sides of my statement were equally specious. I was simply trying to frame the opposite ends of the spectrum as far away as I could, for purposes of the point I was trying to make.
I think your reaction to this is the very problem you're trying to describe, but, to each their own.
This is the false dichotomy so often pushed by right-wing ideologues. Literally nobody on any side of the abortion debate advocates for "abortions up to a week after birth" or anywhere close to that. This sort of boolean thinking is the root of our (especially current) toxic political climate.