Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

it's still limiting if you define it to broadly. if i defined a law that said every owner of a home will be punished if somebody in that home smoked weed or did drugs.

and airbnb is gone, and so on.



Neither I nor rpearl claimed it wasn't limiting.

The intent was to protect people who are being harmed against their will (held in sex slavery against their will).

Of course the actual effect of the law is different than the intent. The actual effect is limiting.


Do you think the actual intent is closer the stated intent, or to the actual results?

We're talking about seasoned politicians, not naive dreamers.


The actual intent probably is closer to the stated intent. The actual results just don't matter to them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: