Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The researchers deserve some of the blame as well. In physics, at least, and certainly in some other fields, there is a strong tradition of posting preprints to the arXiv or other similar free archives. The journals, including all the top journals, accommodate this---they have no choice.

You mention chemistry. I don't know anything about chemistry journals, but given the precedent set by other fields, I feel that chemists don't have a good excuse for locking their research up behind paywalls.



Some chemistry journals do not allow you to publish if you place a copy on a preprint server like arxiv. The key to this battle will be funding agencies.


Well... you could still make the copy available after the article was published.


If you don't mind breaking your contract with the publisher.


What can they do against it?


Sue you for damages.


You mean, all $0 of them?


Stop being obstinate. You know exactly what the parent means, and that publishers can sue authors who distribute the works for which they (the publishers) own copyright.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: