the idea of internal tagging to start having a better idea of impressions is good.
I'll have our developer work on it.
The problem here is that the company we work with has access to the big names in the industry. Having their ad campaigns on our sites actually adds credibility to the sites themselves.
But I might start looking into cutting my middleman and going to the advertisers directly.
We do receive approximately 1M pageviews a month - with usually 2-3 ads per page.
The company who does the selling now has a sales funnel that we cannot match. Close relationships to big companies to whom they sell very relevant campaigns.
This said, we make approximately $2/3,000 per month with advertising.
I believe it's really small. They say it's because half of the pageviews are on mobile so many of their ads don't show.
Even this considered, I am growing tired of having that revenue amount as my only benchmark. I have been asking for detailed reporting for months and have not received any...
Regarding the choice - why no DFP? It seems to be the easiest one.
I presume that the content on your website is somewhat NSFW, otherwise you would be using Google Adsense or media.net to server the adverts. They give full reports, pay well, and in my experience pay higher for mobile browsers.
You say that they send you a cheque, with no breakdown of figures. This seems almost unbelievable to me.
not NSFW at all! Actually our advertisers are as Top100 as they come!
Adsense was not really performing that well when we made the switch, but even after the switch to the new provider - we haven't experienced the highs we were hoping for.
But yes, the company who manages our inventory is quite respected in the industry we are in - simply horrible with their reporting for our figures.
And yes, no breakdown of figures. I guess this is the wake up call i needed to either start receiving reporting, or sever our relationship.
It's an agency. They have actual sales people who have relationships with the companies and sell them ad campaigns on individual sites (in a certain niche).
Because I have an exclusive agreement with that agency.
It's obvious now after reading some of these answers that i need to review my agreement with them
I will be counter-intuitive here and ask you this.
Is the domain worth 20k for you? If it is, and you think in the long run it will add 20k to your bottom line, then buy it.
If for any reason the startup won't succeed (knock on wood), if that is an appetizing enough .com, it will still be worth its asking price.
I recently read the examine.com guys bought it for 42k. I thought that was a very big risk for a starting blog. But in fairness, i think a domain name like examine.com could be re-sold for a very similar amount in short time.
If you think the .com is not worth 20k for you, or if you don't have 20k - then go for a prefix/suffix.
Buy cheap brand PPC campaigns on Googlee for your brand (I assume the parked domain isn't doing it) so that when people Google the name, they get to you. And eventually if you have constant Ads on top, and your site has a content as opposed to a parked domain,it will rank better in google too.
We can put 20k on a domain name if we really want to.
But from my experience, a domain name is a domain name and it's usually not worth that much of the money. 20k can be spent in a marketing campaign that will out weigth the benefits of having the "pure" .com
Having "Examine.com" as our brand brought us weight - the domain is easy to remember, easy to understand, has a link to what we're selling, and so forth.
BUT - that 42k was never all we had. It was maybe ~25% of what we had. We decided that the brandability of the domain was more important than buying ads.
As you have a SaaS business, buying ads may work out. On the other hand, having a non-.com may backfire.